1. Brekeke Product Name and Version: Brekeke SIP Server Advanced Edition v3.16.4.9/576.2
2. Java version: 11.0.0.1
3. OS type and the version: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: Yealink T42G
5. Your problem:
I am connecting to a remote BSS server from a Yealink T42G. My router is assigned with a CGNAT IP address (100.64.x.x) from the ISP.
The problem is BSS is treating this CGNAT IP as an internal IP address and as a result it switches to using the private IP address of the phone. The inbound call fails as BSS can not communicate directly to the phone's LAN IP.
The only workaround I have found so far is by using the 'External IP address pattern' value in the Configuration->System page. Here I add regex to match CGNAT address space. I am worried this may not work in all scenarios and there could be an official way of resolving this. Perhaps it could be a bug. Has anyone else come across this? I know more and more ISPs are using CGNAT due to the limited IPv4 address space available.
I saw an old post on here from 2014 by Laurie where they use the IP address pattern function to resolve it, but I am not sure if this is still required for the newer version:
https://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/viewtop ... hlight=nat
Thanks.
2. Java version: 11.0.0.1
3. OS type and the version: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: Yealink T42G
5. Your problem:
I am connecting to a remote BSS server from a Yealink T42G. My router is assigned with a CGNAT IP address (100.64.x.x) from the ISP.
The problem is BSS is treating this CGNAT IP as an internal IP address and as a result it switches to using the private IP address of the phone. The inbound call fails as BSS can not communicate directly to the phone's LAN IP.
The only workaround I have found so far is by using the 'External IP address pattern' value in the Configuration->System page. Here I add regex to match CGNAT address space. I am worried this may not work in all scenarios and there could be an official way of resolving this. Perhaps it could be a bug. Has anyone else come across this? I know more and more ISPs are using CGNAT due to the limited IPv4 address space available.
I saw an old post on here from 2014 by Laurie where they use the IP address pattern function to resolve it, but I am not sure if this is still required for the newer version:
https://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/viewtop ... hlight=nat
Thanks.